Malaysian University English Test (MUET) became a widely implemented tool for language proficiency estimation in 1999, and it was initially conducted by Malaysian Examinations Council. In a nutshell, it is a method to estimate each candidate’s English language expertise and proficiency. One is offered to accomplish a writing task that is based on a provided topic. The distinctive feature of MUET essays lies in the complex nature of arguments, which naturally involve reasoning, impact, and result. MUET sample essay is created on the base of a debatable topic chosen randomly; and it represents a classical pattern of argumentative essay. The general subject of this paper is the benefits of vegetarianism for all people. It has been given that all population should gradually change their diet to eating meat-free food. The purpose is to comment on both views and to provide short examples.
The issue of total conversion to vegetarianism gets its unceasing share of attention from the environmentalists, doctors and other groups of scientists. The supporters of the meat-free diet strongly believe that all humans are able to consume vegetarian products; and that is the only thing that can ultimately improve their lives and the environment globally. An opposing point of view is supported by individuals with more conservative ideas. They suppose that vegetarianism may affect human health and can hardly resist the global environmental changes. The question is, whose position is more relevant: the one supported by meat lovers or the one assumed by vegetarians.
On the one hand, the supporters of vegetarian diet state that reducing the consumption of meat makes people feel healthier, as they start eating more diversified and enriched diet. Also, they are more likely to avoid numerous cardiovascular diseases related to excessive amounts of slags and fats in their organisms. At the same time, total conversion to vegetarianism may ensure better global environmental conditions, as the food processing industry releases lots of toxic chemicals into the world. Besides, refusal to eat meat will definitely save the lives of numerous domesticated animals that are currently living in harsh conditions only to be killed in the end. Thus, the decision to convert to vegetarianism has many practical advantages and resolved the moral dilemma of killing live creatures for food.
On the other hand, some people argue that eating meat is an essential demand of any human organism that is deeply rooted in the early pre-human history and evolutionary process. Correspondingly, the ones who refuse to eat meat resist their nature and their organisms’ needs. Besides, vegetarianism can hardly change the earthy life for better, as the humanity is currently facing more serious and dangerous problems caused by the global climate change. It is more about conversion to alternative fuels than refusing meat. Thus, the supporters of the consumption of meat products consider vegetarianism as a way to show-off rather than an actually effective way to combat global humanity’s issues.
Therefore, vegetarianism is important within the global community as it draws mass attention to health problems and environmental concerns. At the same time, its total implementation is not a panacea for all global issues of the humanity. The society ought to implement a complex set of actions in order to improve the living conditions on Earth. In this context, accepting a vegetarian diet may accomplish the first step towards fulfilling the needs and solving the problems of the world’s population.
- Craig, W. (2009). Health effects of vegan diets. American Journal Of Clinical Nutrition, 89(5), 1627S-1633S. http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736n
- Fox, N. & Ward, K. (2008). Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite, 50(2-3), 422-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.007
- PETA,. (2016). Vegetarianism and the Environment. PETA. Retrieved 15 September 2016, from http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/animals-used-food-factsheets/vegetarianism-environment/
- Wallis, I. (2014). Is vegetarianism bad for the environment?. Australian Zoologist, (aop), 150623093655008. http://dx.doi.org/10.7882/az.2014.034
- Yokoyama, Y., Nishimura, K., Barnard, N., Takegami, M., Watanabe, M., & Sekikawa, A. et al. (2014). Vegetarian Diets and Blood Pressure. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(4), 577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14547